An Exclusive Interview with Human rights advocate, Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib

Human rights & gender equality advocate, Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib
Following is an exclusive interview given to Adam Mohamed of Adamington Online by the Research and Advocacy Coordinator at non-partisan NGO Transparency Maldives, Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib via an email after a Direct Message (DM) session of Twitter. Human rights & gender equality advocate Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib’s research interests are in the areas of human rights, gender equality and the religion Islam. He is also known as an active member in the civil society sector of the Maldives. 
==================================================================================

Adam Mohamed: In general, Human rights are known as the moral principles which describe certain standards of human behavior. What is the broad definition of human rights according to the universal declaration of human rights?

Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib: According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the foundation of freedom, justice and peace is the equal rights of humans. The failure to recognize and disregard human rights has resulted in cruel acts limiting space for enjoying human rights. The UDHR sets a common standard of achievement for all the peoples.

Adam Mohamed: People who do not know their rights are vulnerable and easy prey for ill-intended individuals. It is also said that countries such as Syria, Somalia, Libya, Cuba and Saudi Arabia are more places where people suffer from some of the most severe, systematic abuses of human rights. Do you believe that human rights violation is happening in Maldives in a wide range without being noticed to the established system in our nation?

Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib: It is possible that individuals who are not aware of what their rights are might fail to realize when a right has been abused. It is the duty of the State to protect and promote human rights and freedoms as stipulated in Article 18 of the Constitution.

Majority of the countries, including the Maldives are party to the major human rights treaties. Despite this, more than 150 countries out of the 193 countries that belong to United Nations (UN) engage in torture. The universality of human rights is often questioned and contested with valid reasoning. Traditional human rights champions, including Europe and the United States (US) have involved in rights violations, for instance US used torture after 9/11, and still use drone strike in which civilians are killed. Therefore, it is inconvenient to say which countries are more vulnerable and which countries are offenders when it comes to human rights.

Multiple human rights violations do take place in the Maldives, without a doubt. And the ‘established system’ is very well aware of such violations and often complicit. A fundamental idea of the rights-based approach is that the individuals/citizens are the rights holders whereas the State is the fundamental duty bearer. It is therefore a responsibility of the State to ensure that rights are not violated. Chapter two of the Maldives Constitution lists the fundamental rights and freedoms. However, in the past few years, several rights, including freedom of assembly and freedom of media has been deteriorated through legislative changes. Additionally, the State is failing to ensure fundamental rights such as right to life, liberty and security of person. One can argue that it is systematic failures that led to the brutal murder of Dr. Afrasheem Ali in 2012, abduction of Ahmed Rilwan in 2015, and the recent brutal murder of Yameen Rasheed, and the several other murders of Maldivians and expatriate workers in the Maldives.

Adam Mohamed: Fundamental rights are generally regarded as a set of legal protections in the context of a legal system which belong without presumption or any cost of privilege to all human beings. What do you believe as the biggest threat or challenge facing to the fundamental human rights in Maldives?

Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib: Politics transcends everything including human rights. I strongly believe that it is the elite political culture that is a key challenge to the protection of human rights in the Maldives. Undemocratic practices and the complicit relationship between politics and corrupt and criminal elements in the society hinder the protection of human rights, in efforts to maintain the elite political culture.

Adam Mohamed: Democracy is said to be at risk in Maldives precisely as many citizens today don't feel they are effective participants in the political process due to many barriers within the system. What should be the central premise of democratic practice in a democratic nation?

Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib: Citizens do participate in the political processes in the Maldives. For instance, in the 2013 Presidential Elections over 90% of eligible voters voted. Political parties have significant membership. However, the political culture of the Maldives does not facilitate deliberative democracy, and therefore people’s participation does not necessarily include reasoning and justifications of political decisions.

Adam Mohamed: A nationwide survey report, titled, “A Troubled Future for Democracy” by Transparency Maldives two years back says that most citizens lack confidence in key state institutions including the parliament and the courts of Maldives. How important is it to have effective links between the citizens and the state in a democracy?

Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib: The legitimacy of a government in a democracy is grounded in the support and trust of the citizens. The low level of trust in State institutions in an expression of thinning legitimacy of a government. To ensure a legitimate democratic system of governance, it is important that the State genuinely understands the discontent of the citizens, and regain trust. One avenue through which this can be achieved is by promoting deliberative democracy where State actors continuously and vigorously engage with citizens.

Adam Mohamed: A democracy is said to be a system of government in which power is vested in the people which provides its citizens with the most freedom. In your opinion, is democracy the best form of government for Maldives?

Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib: There is a strong support for democracy in the Maldives. In 2015, 62% of Maldivians agreed that democracy is the best system for Maldives, despite problems as shown in the survey “A Troubled Future for Democracy”. This is an increase from 59% in 2013. However, it is important to address the existing issues including addressing the elite political culture in the Maldives. Democracy and Ethics, as John Keane argues, is much neglected today. Democracy’s key ethic, humility is necessary to ensure equality.

Adam Mohamed: Islam specifies 3 basic features which should be in a government: leaders must be elected by the people, subject to sharia and committed to practicing "shura". Some believe that democracy is in contradiction with Islam; however, while much of the Muslim population in the world lives within democratic countries. In your view, can we say Islam isn't compatible with democracy?

Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib: Neither democracy, nor Islam is a fixed; both are multi-vocal. There are multiple debates around the compatibility of democracy and Islam. During former President Maumoon’s presidency, one of his key efforts was to promote one-people “eh baeh vanthakan” as opposed to diversity and acceptance of diversity. This effort was a huge failure. Multiple issues related to ideological divides today is partly a reflection of this failure. The focus of this matter (compatibility of democracy and Islam) should be on coexistence. A prediction that I would agree is that Maldives requires a reconfiguration of the political system to ensure humility and tolerance in order to avoid a major conflict between multiple ideologies.

Adam Mohamed: Media plays a crucial role in shaping a healthy democracy & is said to be the sword arm in a democracy. How important is the role of an independent media in a democratic country?

Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib: Independent media can be a tricky term. For example, if we look at media landscape in the Maldives, most or all of the media are aligned with one or the other political party, or are owned by politicians. Conversely, a free media is important for a democratic society. Authoritarian regimes often control the media to serve and maintain their power structure.  However, in a democracy media should be able freely disseminate politically relevant information to the public so that the public is well informed. Free media, in this case acts as a watchdog. Additionally, media should also be able to function as a public forum that reflects the diversity of the society.

Adam Mohamed: The success of democracy depends on the decentralization of power. Through a system of local governance, people can obtain their democratic rights. How do you believe decentralization could satisfy the needs and grievances of the people at local and regional level?

Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib: Decentralization is advocated as a way out of corruption, weak institutions and low levels of legitimacy among other things. It is also meant to address poor public service provisions. There are multiple factors that would make decentralization meaningful. For instance, strong local accountability mechanisms should be in place to ensure that citizens can hold politicians responsible and accountable for their decisions. For local governments to function properly, and address the needs of citizens, devolution is necessary. With devolution, the central government transfers decision making, finance, and management powers to local governments.  Without these powers, it would be impossible for a local government to properly govern the geographical boundary over which they have authority upon.

Adam Mohamed: According to the constitution, Maldives is a multi-party democracy; a system of government in which more than two political parties truly have a chance to get real political power. In Maldives we see that one political party typically holds a majority in the legislature and is usually referred to as the majority or governing party while the other is the minority or opposition party. In this context, do you believe a bi-party system could be useful to Maldives than a multi-party system?

Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib: I strongly believe that right to association should not be limited; likewise no one should be forced to belong to an association. Article 30(a) of the Constitution states that every citizen has the right to establish and participate in the activities of political parties. I also dispute the dissolution of ‘small’ political parties in the Maldives. Once again, the focus should be about moving away from the elite political culture towards humility, deliberation, diversity and tolerance. 

Note: Mr. Ibrahim Thayyib is a human rights & gender equality advocate & a certified Gender Trainer from Maldives. He holds a Master’s degree in Human Rights & Democratization from the University of Sydney, Australia. He is currently the Research and Advocacy Coordinator at Transparency Maldives, a national chapter of Transparency International which is the leading global movement against corruption. 

No comments:

Designed by vnBloggertheme.com | Copyright © 2007 -2018 Adamington Online | Published By Adamington